


Why Does Go\'s `fmt.Println` Produce Unexpected Output When Embedding Types with Conflicting `String()` Methods?
Unexpected String() Method Behavior with Embedded Types
In Go, embedding allows types to include fields and methods from another type within their own structure. However, when multiple embedded types define a method with the same name (such as String()), certain scenarios can lead to unexpected behavior.
Consider the following code:
type Engineer struct { Person TaxPayer Specialization string } type Person struct { Name string Age int } func (p Person) String() string { return fmt.Sprintf("name: %s, age: %d", p.Name, p.Age) } type TaxPayer struct { TaxBracket int } func (t TaxPayer) String() string { return fmt.Sprintf("%d", t.TaxBracket) } func main() { engineer := Engineer{ Person: Person{ Name: "John Doe", Age: 35, }, TaxPayer: TaxPayer{3}, Specialization: "Construction", } fmt.Println(engineer) }
When this code is executed, it produces the following output:
{name: John Doe, age: 35 3 Construction}
This result may seem confusing, as there are multiple String() methods defined within the embedded types Person and TaxPayer. However, the ambiguity is resolved by the following rules:
- If multiple embedded types define a String() method, it is considered an "illegal selector," meaning it cannot be accessed directly (by calling engineer.String(), for example).
- As a result, no String() method is promoted to the embedding type (Engineer), and thus the default formatting (printing the field values) is used.
- However, when the fmt package attempts to produce a default string representation for the Engineer value, it checks if the value implements the fmt.Stringer interface (which has a String() method).
- Since the Person type implements fmt.Stringer, its String() method is called to produce the string representation of the fields (name and age).
Removing the Person.String() method or the TaxPayer.String() method resolves the ambiguity, allowing the remaining String() method to be used for the default formatting.
The key takeaway from this behavior is that embedded types promote their String() methods only if there is a single, unambiguous method defined. If multiple methods exist, the embedding type does not have a promoted String() method, and the default formatting is used.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does Go\'s `fmt.Println` Produce Unexpected Output When Embedding Types with Conflicting `String()` Methods?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
