ES6 Modules: Exporting Multiple or Individual Methods
ES6 modules provide flexible mechanisms for exporting and importing methods. Two primary options are available: exporting a single class with static methods or multiple individual methods.
Exporting:
Instead of using a class with static methods, consider using a normal "module" object for export:
// myMethods.js export default { myMethod1() { /* ... */ }, myMethod2() { /* ... */ } };
Importing:
For importing multiple methods, the preferred approach is to define named exports:
// app.js import {myMethod1, myMethod2} from 'myMethods'; myMethod1(); // logs 'foo'
Comparison:
Exporting: Using a module object instead of a class with static methods reduces code complexity.
Importing: While the " as" syntax allows for convenient dot notation, it may not be suitable in all contexts. Named exports provide more explicit references to imported modules.
Performance Implications:
Performance differences are minimal between exporting a class or individual methods. Optimization techniques such as JIT may favor named exports and smaller file sizes, however, noticeable improvements are unlikely.
Conclusion:
The choice between exporting a single class or multiple methods depends on maintainability and developer preference. While the " as" syntax offers certain advantages, named exports are generally a more robust and flexible approach for importing multiple methods.
The above is the detailed content of ES6 Modules: Export Single Class or Multiple Methods?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!