Why C Doesn't Simplify Array Return Types
While programming languages like Java allow straightforward array return types, C requires a more complex approach. This is not arbitrary but stems from fundamental language design decisions.
Memory Management and Pass-by-Value vs. Pass-by-Reference
C distinguishes between pass-by-value and pass-by-reference. Array names are essentially pointers. Passing an array by value evaluates to the memory address of its first element, which is lost beyond the function's scope.
Contrast with Java
Java ostensibly uses pass-by-value, but it employs "clever" values that are often memory addresses. Java's convenient array return types are achieved through automatic memory management and pointer wrapping, resulting in reduced efficiency.
C 's Trade-offs
C was created with performance as a priority, sacrificing automatic memory management for speed. Returning a C array requires explicit memory allocation and pointer handling, mirroring C's approach.
Template Class Exception
Template classes can return arrays because they use classes. However, returning a C array still requires manual memory management.
Historical Context
C 's creator, Bjarne Stroustrup, aimed to preserve C's performance while incorporating OOP features from Simula. The decision to limit automatic memory management was made for efficiency.
Therefore, while C supports array return types, it prioritizes memory management and speed over convenience, unlike Java's more simplified approach.
The above is the detailed content of Why Can't C Return Arrays Directly Like Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!