std::endl vs. "n" vs. "n": Which is Best for std::cout?
The debate between using std::endl, "n", or "n" as a newline character in std::cout can be traced back to the early days of C . While std::endl was commonly used in the past, it is now considered unnecessary and even potentially harmful in many situations.
Performance Implications
std::endl is a stream manipulator that inserts both a newline character and flushes the output stream. While flushing can be useful in certain circumstances, such as forcing output to a file or terminal, it can also lead to performance issues. Flushing unnecessarily can significantly slow down your program, especially in performance-critical applications.
On the other hand, "n" is a single character representing a newline. It can be directly inserted into the output stream using the insertion operator (<<). This method does not involve any overhead for flushing or creating an intermediate object like std::endl.
Code Clarity
Using "n" also improves code clarity. It explicitly conveys that you intend to write a newline character, whereas std::endl might lead to confusion if its purpose is not fully understood.
Late Addition: Flushing Considerations
Note that flushing does not always occur when using "n". By default, std::cout is tied to the stdout stream, which is line-buffered for terminal output. This means that a newline will trigger flushing only when the output buffer is full. However, if std::cout is redirected or the tie is broken, flushing will not happen automatically.
Recommendation
In most cases, it is preferable to use "n" instead of std::endl for std::cout. This ensures optimal performance, enhances code clarity, and avoids potential issues related to inadvertent flushing. The use of "n" is the default recommended by the C standard.
The above is the detailed content of std::endl vs. \'\\n\': Which is the Best Newline Character for std::cout?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!