Home > Backend Development > Golang > Is There a Faster Way to Check if a big.Int is Zero Than Cmp(zero)?

Is There a Faster Way to Check if a big.Int is Zero Than Cmp(zero)?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Release: 2024-11-26 06:38:13
Original
453 people have browsed it

Is There a Faster Way to Check if a big.Int is Zero Than Cmp(zero)?

Alternatives to Cmp(zero) for Testing if a big.Int is 0

When working with big.Ints, testing for the value 0 is a common task. While using Cmp(zero) to compare a big.Int to a zero value is a viable option, this method may not always be the quickest. This article explores alternative methods that can offer improved performance for this specific scenario.

Accessing Raw Byte Representation

big.Int exposes the Int.Bits() method to access the raw bytes of its representation. This slice provides direct access to the integer's internal representation, which is shared with the original big.Int. This means that accessing the bits directly is a performant operation.

Testing for 0

As mentioned in the documentation, the zero value for a big.Int represents the value 0. Therefore, its corresponding slice will be empty. By checking the length of this slice, we can efficiently determine if the big.Int is 0:

if len(i1.Bits()) == 0 {
    // i1 is 0
}
Copy after login

Alternatively, the Int.BitLen() function returns the bit length of a big.Int. Since the bit length of 0 is also 0, this method can be used similarly:

if i1.BitLen() == 0 {
    // i1 is 0
}
Copy after login

Benchmark Results

Benchmarking the performance of our proposed methods demonstrates significant improvements over the traditional Cmp(zero) approach:

BenchmarkCompare-8      76975251            13.3 ns/op
BenchmarkBits-8         1000000000           0.656 ns/op
BenchmarkBitLen-8       1000000000           1.11 ns/op
Copy after login

As evident, getting the bits and comparing the slice length to 0 is approximately 20 times faster than Cmp(zero), while using Int.BitLen() is about 10 times faster.

Conclusion

By leveraging the Int.Bits() method and its shared implementation with Int.BitLen(), we can efficiently test if a big.Int is 0 without sacrificing performance. These alternatives offer significant speed advantages for applications that require frequent 0-checking of big integers.

The above is the detailed content of Is There a Faster Way to Check if a big.Int is Zero Than Cmp(zero)?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template