Simplify Your REST API Responses with Milogo for Gin-Gonic
Gin-Gonic Middleware that implements fields selection pattern
At my company we use Go to build internal tools. Recently I worked in a REST API using gin-gonic, that required displaying a lot of data across many endpoints.
One must have feature in this type of scenario, is pagination, but and often overlooked pattern is partial response (a.k.a field selection). Which is also a very nice addition to filter out the amount of data in the responses of your web server.
What’s field selection?
Let us first make it clear what I mean with a field selection. Imagine that you have the following endpoint:
// > GET /api/products [ { "id": 1, "createdAt": "2024-18-11", "updatedAt": "2024-18-11", "code": "1", "price": { "amount": 100, "currency": "EUR" }, "manufacturedBy": "myshop", "stock": 552, ... }, ... ]
Using partial responses, clients can filter the output with a fields query parameter, e.g.
// > GET /api/products?fields=code,price [ { "code": "1", "price": { "amount": 100, "currency": "EUR" } }, ... ]
Only the fields declared in the query parameter are returned. Reducing the payload size and saving bandwidth.
Introducing Milogo
I could not find any implementation available for this pattern, so I decided to create it myself, and that is how Milogo was born.
Milogo is a Gin middleware that processes API responses, filters out fields specified in the fields query parameter, and return only the requested data.
Some of the main features available:
Support for json objects and json arrays.
So Milogo can filter fields for JSON responses that starts with an array of items or just with one single item.Support for filtering out fields in nested json objects.
Milogo also supports filtering nested JSON objects with the following format e.g. code,price(amount)Support for json wrapped in another json.
Sometimes the JSON responses are wrapped in another JSON object, Milogo support filtering the actual payload (see example wrapped):
// GET /products?fields=code,price(amount) { "data": [ { "code": 1, "price": { "amount": 100 } }, ... ], "_metadata": { ... } }
Getting Started
As any gin middleware, Milogo is really easy to use and setup, you can follow the README in the github repository, but basically:
r := gin.Default() r.Use(Milogo())
is enough to add Milogo middleware to your api.
In the previous example Milogo is applied to every single endpoint, but it is also possible to apply only to a group of endpoints, or just to an specific endpoint, e.g.
group := r.Group("/products", milogo.Milogo()) group.GET("", productsHandler)
In the previous example, only the /products group would have the Milogo’s middleware applied.
Conclusion
Milogo is designed to simplify REST API development and improve client-server interactions. Check out the GitHub repository for examples and documentation.
Feel free to reach out or contribute — let’s make REST APIs efficient together!
The above is the detailed content of Simplify Your REST API Responses with Milogo for Gin-Gonic. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
