Why Does C Require a User-Provided Default Constructor to Default-Construct a const Object?
The C standard mandates that if a program calls for the default initialization of an object of a const-qualified type, the underlying class type must possess a user-provided default constructor. This requirement stems from the fact that:
To prevent this quandary, the standard dictates that const objects cannot be constructed from POD types that lack a user-provided default constructor. This ensures that const objects are always initialized upon creation.
Distinction Between POD and Non-POD Classes
To clarify, the standard's requirement applies specifically to const objects of non-POD classes. POD classes, which lack virtual functions or base classes and have data members that are themselves PODs, can be default-initialized even without a user-defined constructor. In contrast, non-POD classes require a user-provided default constructor to enable default initialization.
Illustrative Example
Consider the following code snippet:
struct B { B(): x(42) {} int doSomeStuff() const { return x; } int x; }; struct A { A() {} // Required by the standard B b; // Illustration purpose }; int main() { const A a; // Valid due to user-provided default constructor in A. }
In this example, the const object 'a' of struct A can be default-constructed because A has a user-provided default constructor, which satisfies the standard's requirement for non-POD classes.
The above is the detailed content of Why Must C Classes Have a User-Defined Default Constructor to Default-Construct a `const` Object?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!