Home Backend Development Golang How to Handle Unmarshaling of Unknown Protobuf Messages?

How to Handle Unmarshaling of Unknown Protobuf Messages?

Dec 02, 2024 pm 04:51 PM

How to Handle Unmarshaling of Unknown Protobuf Messages?

Protobuf Unmarshal: Handling Unknown Messages

In scenarios where the message type in a protobuf payload is not known in advance, unmarshaling into an interface{} type is not feasible as it requires an implementation of the protobuf message interface.

Alternative Approach

When at least partial information accompanying the protobuf payload is available, such as a string or number, you can use this as a key to instantiate the appropriate concrete protobuf type and then perform the unmarshaling.

Handling Truly Unknown Messages

If all information about the message type is absent, the protowire package can be utilized to extract limited information from the wire format of the protobuf payload.

Risks and Limitations

Parsing unknown proto messages presents certain challenges:

  • Ambiguous Representation: The wire format can be ambiguous, making it difficult to determine the exact type of certain data structures.
  • Loss of Subfield Information: Wrapped messages can lose context about wire type and tag number, potentially limiting the ability to reconstruct the original message structure.
  • Exclusion of Non-Proto Types: Non-proto data such as wrapped JSON or XML may not be captured accurately.

Sample Implementation

The code below provides an example of parsing an unknown protobuf message:

package main

import (
    "fmt"

    "github.com/jhump/protoreflect/desc"
    "github.com/jhump/protoreflect/internal/strategy"
    "github.com/jhump/protoreflect/protopath"
)

// Field represents an individual element parsed from an unknown protobuf message.
type Field struct {
    Tag   Tag
    Val   interface{}
    Length int
}

// Tag represents a field tag with its number and wire type.
type Tag struct {
    Num  int32
    Type int
}

// parseUnknown parses an unknown protobuf message.
func parseUnknown(b []byte, parentMsg *desc.MessageDescriptor) []Field {
    parser := &protowireParser{msg: parentMsg, buf: b}
    return parser.run()
}

type protowireParser struct {
    msg *desc.MessageDescriptor
    buf []byte
}

const wireTypeMask = 0x7

func (p *protowireParser) run() (fields []Field) {
    for len(p.buf) > 0 {
        field, l, err := protowire.ConsumeField(p.buf)
        if err != nil || l < 1 {
            log.Printf("Error parsing field: %v", err)
            p.buf = nil
            return
        }

        tag := Tag{Num: field.Tag, Type: field.WireType & wireTypeMask}

        var v interface{}
        switch field.WireType & wireTypeMask {
        // ... handle different wire types
        }

        fields = append(fields, Field{Tag: tag, Val: v, Length: l})
        p.buf = p.buf[l:]
    }

    return fields
}
Copy after login

Conclusion

Parsing truly unknown protobuf messages is a complex task, but by leveraging the protowire package, you can extract limited information that may be sufficient for your specific scenario. Remember, this approach is not suitable for production-grade applications where accurate representation is critical.

The above is the detailed content of How to Handle Unmarshaling of Unknown Protobuf Messages?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1664
14
PHP Tutorial
1268
29
C# Tutorial
1242
24
Golang's Purpose: Building Efficient and Scalable Systems Golang's Purpose: Building Efficient and Scalable Systems Apr 09, 2025 pm 05:17 PM

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed Comparison Golang vs. C : Performance and Speed Comparison Apr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

The Performance Race: Golang vs. C The Performance Race: Golang vs. C Apr 16, 2025 am 12:07 AM

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

See all articles