Should You Use 'getClass()' or 'instanceof' in Your .equals() Method?
When generating .equals() methods using Eclipse, you have the option between using 'instanceof' or '.getClass()' to compare types. By default, Eclipse uses '.getClass()', leaving many programmers wondering if they should switch to 'instanceof'.
What's the Difference?
.getClass() directly compares the run-time type of two objects, while instanceof checks if an object is an instance of a particular class or interface. For example:
if (getClass() != obj.getClass()) // Using getClass() if (!(obj instanceof MyClass)) // Using instanceof
Which One Should You Use?
According to Java expert Josh Bloch, 'instanceof' is the preferred approach because it doesn't restrict equality to the same run-time type. This means you can extend a class and add methods without affecting the equality of objects that share the same important aspects.
Furthermore, it aligns with the Liskov substitution principle, which states that a subclass should be able to be used in place of its superclass without breaking code. Using '.getClass()' violates this principle, leading to unexpected behavior in collections like HashTable.
In summary, 'instanceof' provides more flexibility and is recommended for .equals() methods. While you can remove the 'if (obj == null)' check with 'instanceof', it's generally advisable to keep it for clarity and completeness.
The above is the detailed content of `getClass()` vs. `instanceof` in `equals()`: Which Should You Use?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!