When dealing with small structs with only two members, the choice between using a standard pair or a tuple can be a dilemma. While pairs offer convenient operators such as operator< for strict-weak-ordering, their variable names can be less than intuitive. Tuples, on the other hand, provide flexibility but can lead to less clear code.
To address these drawbacks, some have suggested relying solely on tuple operations to implement comparison operators. This can greatly simplify the process, as seen in the code snippet below:
bool operator<(MyStruct const& lhs, MyStruct const& rhs) { return std::tie(lhs.one_member, lhs.another, lhs.yet_more) < std::tie(rhs.one_member, rhs.another, rhs.yet_more); }
However, there are potential drawbacks to consider:
Ultimately, the choice of using tuple and tie for comparison operators depends on the specific needs of the application. If ease of implementation and maintainability are prioritized, the tuple-based approach may be a suitable option. However, if performance optimizations or custom comparison criteria are essential, a bespoke operator implementation might be more appropriate.
The above is the detailed content of Is Using `std::tie` for Comparison Operators in Structs a Sound Approach?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!