


Why do Go's `fmt.Printf` outputs differ when printing pointers to structs and pointers to map values?
Pointers in Go: Understanding the Printf Formatting
In Go, pointers play a crucial role in passing variables by reference. However, their usage can sometimes lead to unexpected results, as seen in the code example provided. Let's delve into the details and resolve the discrepancies.
The Problem:
The code attempts to print two variables, one a pointer to a Test struct (&test1) and the other a value from a map (&test2). The issue arises when printing these values, as they produce different outputs.
The Explanation:
The key to understanding the discrepancy lies in the fmt.Printf function. This function takes a format string and a variable number of arguments of type interface{}. When passing a value that is not of type interface{}, it is automatically wrapped in an interface{} value.
In the first case, &test1 is of type *Test, and when passed to fmt.Printf, it is wrapped in an interface{} value. The default formatting for pointers is %p, which prints the hexadecimal address of the value. Hence, the output is "0xc00009e190".
In contrast, &test2 is of type *interface{}. When passed to fmt.Printf, it is wrapped in another interface{} value. The default formatting for interface{} values is %v and varies depending on the underlying type. In this case, the underlying type is a pointer to interface{}, and the %v format for pointers is %p. Therefore, the output is also a hexadecimal address, but for the address of the *interface{} value, hence "0xc00029c0a0".
The Solution:
To obtain a struct value from test2, type assertion can be used. This essentially assumes that the value stored in test2 is a Test struct and casts it appropriately.
test2 := Models["test"].(Test)
With this modification, test2 will be of type Test, and when passed to fmt.Printf, it will produce the same output as &test1.
Best Practice:
It is generally recommended to store *Test values in the map directly to avoid the need for type assertions or intermediate variable declarations. This ensures that the interface values stored in the map are already pointers to Test, which can be used and passed around as-is.
The above is the detailed content of Why do Go's `fmt.Printf` outputs differ when printing pointers to structs and pointers to map values?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
