


Why Are Parentheses Required After Closure Bodies in Go's Deferred Statements?
Closure Invocations in Go
In Go, the usage of parentheses after the body of a closure is not limited to closure contexts. The core concept that governs this behavior is that expressions within deferred statements must be function calls.
Function Literals with Closures
Consider a function literal such as func(ch chan int) { ch <- ACK }(), where the parentheses follow the closure body. This syntax encloses the closure in an immediately invoked function call. This allows the function to execute upon initialization, passing the argument replyChan to the closure.
Deferred Statements
In deferred statements, such as defer func() { result }(), the parentheses ensure that the enclosed expression is a function call. Without this syntax, the expression would be incomplete and not a valid function call. The syntax for deferred statements therefore mandates that the expression must be a function invocation.
Orthogonality with Function Calls
This orthogonality ensures consistency with function calls outside of deferred statements. For example, f(), where f is a function value, represents a function invocation that returns a value. In contrast, f, without parentheses, represents the function value itself. This parallel syntax applies to expressions within deferred statements as well.
Closure Execution
In a closure defined within a deferred statement, the parentheses determine when the closure will execute. For example, in defer func() { fmt. Println(i) }(), the closure executes immediately when the defer statement is encountered, capturing the current value of i. In contrast, defer func(n int) { fmt. Println(n) }(i) captures and prints the value of i at the time of the defer statement execution, not when the closure executes.
The above is the detailed content of Why Are Parentheses Required After Closure Bodies in Go's Deferred Statements?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
