How to Implement a Timed Wait for WaitGroup.Wait() in Go?
Timed Wait for WaitGroup.Wait()
In Go, the WaitGroup type is used to synchronize multiple goroutines until all have completed their tasks. The WaitGroup.Wait() method blocks until all members of the group have signaled their completion or the context is canceled.
However, it is sometimes desirable to impose a timeout on the WaitGroup wait operation, to prevent the scheduler from indefinitely waiting for an errant worker. This opens up philosophical questions about the reliability and recoverability of the system in the presence of such errors, but this discussion is beyond the scope of this question.
Solution
The provided solution utilizes a channel and a select statement to achieve the timeout functionality:
c := make(chan struct{}) go func() { defer wg.Done() // Do the work c <- struct{}{} }() select { case <-c: // Work completed case <-time.After(timeout): // Timed out }
This solution is effective, but it may seem overly convoluted. The following tips can improve it:
- Consider using channel closure to signal completion instead of sending a value on the channel. Reading from a closed channel always proceeds immediately.
- Use the defer statement to signal completion. It executes even if a function terminates abruptly.
- If there is only one job to wait for, omit the WaitGroup and use a channel directly.
- For timeouts, specify the duration directly, e.g., timeout := time.Second (or 2 * time.Second for a 2-second timeout).
Helper Function
To simplify the process, a helper function can be created to encapsulate the timeout logic:
func waitTimeout(wg *sync.WaitGroup, timeout time.Duration) bool { c := make(chan struct{}) go func() { defer close(c) wg.Wait() }() select { case <-c: return false // Completed normally case <-time.After(timeout): return true // Timed out } }
This function wraps the timeout functionality and makes it easy to use:
if waitTimeout(&wg, time.Second) { fmt.Println("Timed out waiting for wait group") } else { fmt.Println("Wait group finished") }
This approach provides a cleaner and more convenient way to handle timeouts for WaitGroup.Wait() operations.
The above is the detailed content of How to Implement a Timed Wait for WaitGroup.Wait() in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
