How to Convert a Slice of Structs to a Slice of Interfaces in Go?
Converting Slice of Structs to Slice of Interface
When attempting to assign a slice of structs to a slice of interfaces, such as in the case of passing data to AppEngine's datastore.PutMulti, you may encounter compilation errors due to type incompatibility. The error likely reads, "cannot use type []*MyStruct as type []interface { } in assignment."
To understand this issue, it's essential to recognize that assigning a slice of structs to a slice of interfaces involves more than a simple type conversion. Instead, each struct element must be individually wrapped within an interface. This process creates a pointer to the original struct and includes a descriptor for its type.
As a result, there is no direct or automated way to copy a slice of structs into a slice of interfaces. Each element must be explicitly copied and wrapped within an interface to achieve the desired output. Therefore, the only viable solution is to perform the assignment one element at a time.
Consider the following snippet as an example:
var src []*MyStruct = append(src, &MyStruct {...}) var dest []interface{} for _, s := range src { dest = append(dest, s) }
In this example, the slice of structs is iterated over, and each struct is appended to the slice of interfaces by wrapping it in an interface explicitly. While this process may be tedious, it is the only method to successfully convert a slice of structs to a slice of interfaces.
The above is the detailed content of How to Convert a Slice of Structs to a Slice of Interfaces in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.
