Java Reflection: A Performance Trade-Off
Despite its powerful introspection capabilities, Java reflection bears a noticeable performance cost when compared to conventional object creation methods. Let's delve into the reasons behind this disparity.
Reflection vs. Constructor Invocation
Creating an object through reflection involves dynamically resolving class types, preventing the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) from performing certain optimizations. As a result, reflective operations suffer from slower performance compared to their non-reflective counterparts.
Impact on Performance
To illustrate this performance difference, consider the following code snippet:
public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { A a = new A(); a.doSomething(); } System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime); // No reflection startTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { A a = (A) Class.forName("A").newInstance(); a.doSomething(); } System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime); // Using reflection } } class A { void doSomething() {} }
Executing this code on Sun JRE 6u10 results in significantly slower performance when using reflection:
35 // No reflection 465 // Using reflection
Optimizing Reflection
While reflection generally imposes a performance penalty, there are some strategies to mitigate its impact:
Conclusion
Reflection in Java provides immense flexibility but comes at a cost in terms of performance. However, with careful optimization, developers can minimize this overhead and leverage reflection's power without compromising application responsiveness.
The above is the detailed content of Is Java Reflection Worth the Performance Hit?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!