Why Are C References Non-Reseatable?

The Rationale Behind Non-Reseatable References in C

C references possess distinct characteristics that set them apart from pointers. They immutably bind to a single object, ensuring a constant association and eliminating the possibility of becoming null. In contrast, pointers offer flexibility in referencing different objects and can hold null values.

The question arises: why does C lack a "non-nullable, reseatable reference or pointer"? Examining this absence sheds light on the reasoning behind the design of references in C and their unique advantages.

Stroustrup, the creator of C , reveals the rationale in his book "Design and Evolution of C ." He explains that the decision to prohibit the resetting of references was intentional, arising from a desire to avoid potential confusion and runtime errors.

In Algol68, references can be reassigned, allowing them to either modify the referenced object or point to a new object. Stroustrup observed that this flexibility could lead to ambiguous and error-prone code, especially in situations involving multiple references.

By making references non-resetable, C ensures that a reference always refers to the same object. This simplifies code comprehension, reduces the scope for accidental reassignments, and enhances the reliability of reference-based programming. While this constraint may limit certain use cases, it promotes clarity, consistency, and correctness in C code.

The above is the detailed content of Why Are C References Non-Reseatable?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!