Home > Backend Development > C++ > Should Pass-by-Value Be the Default for Value Types in C 11?

Should Pass-by-Value Be the Default for Value Types in C 11?

Susan Sarandon
Release: 2024-12-05 18:13:11
Original
408 people have browsed it

Should Pass-by-Value Be the Default for Value Types in C  11?

Pass-by-Value in C 11: A Reassessment

In C 11, the introduction of rvalue references and move constructors has sparked a debate: should pass-by-value become the default for value types?

Origins of Pass-by-Reference

Historically, passing large objects by value in C was inefficient due to unnecessary copying. Reference parameters were preferred to avoid the costly duplication. However, references introduced complexities in ownership and memory management, particularly for heap-allocated objects.

The New Paradigm in C 11

With rvalue references and move constructors, it is now feasible to implement value types like std::vector and std::string that are inexpensive to pass by value. This raises the question: should pass-by-value be the new standard for these types?

Recommendations

According to Dave Abrahams, passing by value is recommended if a copy is required within the function. This allows the compiler to optimize the copy, as seen in the following example:

void foo(T t)
{
    // ...
}
Copy after login

This can be used flexibly to pass lvalues, prvalues, or xvalues:

T lval;
foo(lval); // copy from lvalue
foo(T {}); // (potential) move from prvalue
foo(std::move(lval)); // (potential) move from xvalue
Copy after login

Exceptions

Pass-by-reference to const remains a reasonable option for certain scenarios where a copy is unnecessary or undesirable. In such cases, the following syntax can be employed:

class T {
    U u;
    V v;
public:
    T(U u, V v)
        : u(std::move(u))
        , v(std::move(v))
    {}
};
Copy after login

Conclusion

In C 11, pass-by-value is a compelling option for value types that require copying within functions. It simplifies parameter handling and allows for efficient move operations. However, pass-by-reference to const remains a suitable alternative in cases where a copy is not required.

The above is the detailed content of Should Pass-by-Value Be the Default for Value Types in C 11?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template