


Why does printing a Go pointer to a struct from a map sometimes show an address instead of the struct's value?
Understanding the Nuances of Go Pointers
In Go, grasping the subtleties of pointers is crucial for effective programming. This article delves into a specific scenario where a value stored in a map and printed as a pointer yields unexpected results.
The Problem: Unveiling the Enigma
A Go program works with a map (Models) holding key-value pairs, one of which includes a struct value (Test) designated for use with the GORM First() function. The puzzling behavior arises when trying to retrieve the struct from the map and print it as a pointer. While the GORM function requires a struct, the printing operation produces an output that appears to be merely an address.
The Solution: Unraveling the Mystery
The key lies in delving into the intricacies of the fmt package's default formatting. When printing a value without specifying a format, fmt.Printf() uses default rules based on the value type. In the initial example, test1 is of type Test and is passed as a pointer to the print function. According to the default formatting, pointers to structs are represented as &{field0 field1 ...}, explaining the appearance of &{a} when the field Test is initialized to "a".
However, the second example involves subtle differences. The value (test2) retrieved from the Models map is of type interface{} due to the map's type declaration (map[string]interface{}). When attempting to print the pointer to test2, the value is essentially wrapped in an additional interface{} value, resulting in a type of *interface{}. The default formatting for *interface{} values dictates printing the address, hence the observed hexadecimal address value output.
Resolving the Dilemma: A More Elegant Approach
To effectively extract the desired struct from test2, type assertion can be employed. This involves explicitly casting the interface{} value to the intended type, in this case, Test. By doing so, the test2 value becomes identical in type to test1, producing consistent output when printing.
Alternatively, a more optimal solution would be to store pointers to Test values directly in the Models map, eliminating the need for type assertion or intermediate variable assignment. This ensures that the interface{} values in the map are inherently pointers to Test, ready for direct use or transfer.
Understanding the behavior of pointers and default formatting in Go is essential for navigating the nuances of the Go development environment. By grasping these concepts, programmers can craft elegant and efficient code that harnesses the full potential of Go's capabilities.
The above is the detailed content of Why does printing a Go pointer to a struct from a map sometimes show an address instead of the struct's value?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
