Home > Backend Development > C++ > Does `const` Guarantee Thread-Safety in C 11?

Does `const` Guarantee Thread-Safety in C 11?

Linda Hamilton
Release: 2024-12-10 10:00:20
Original
507 people have browsed it

Does `const` Guarantee Thread-Safety in C  11?

Does const Mean Thread-Safe in C 11?

Introduction

The notion of "thread-safety" in C 11 has been a subject of discussion surrounding the concept of "const." This article explores the relationship between const and thread-safety, clarifying misconceptions and providing a deeper understanding of the language's behavior.

Thread-Safety and const

The term "thread-safe" implies that an object can be accessed concurrently by multiple threads without causing data corruption. The C 11 standard defines thread-safety based on the absence of data races, which occur when two conflicting actions access or modify the same memory location.

In C 11, const objects are expected to be thread-safe operations performed on them are presumed to be read-only. This expectation arises from the Standard Library's requirement that standard library functions avoid data races on const objects.

const vs. Java's "Synchronized"

It is important to note that const in C 11 is not equivalent to Java's "synchronized." While Java's "synchronized" keyword explicitly enforces thread-safety, const in C 11 merely indicates that an object is not writable.

Thread-safety in C 11 is achieved through synchronization mechanisms such as locks and atomic operations. Const alone does not guarantee thread-safety; it only imposes a contract that operations on const objects are expected to be read-only.

Implications for Object Design

The distinction between thread-safety and const has implications for object design. If an object's data members are immutably set during construction, declaring the object as const ensures that concurrent access is thread-safe. However, if an object's state can be modified, additional synchronization mechanisms are necessary to make it truly thread-safe.

Conclusion

Const in C 11 implies an expectation of thread-safety, particularly in the context of the Standard Library. It is not a guaranteed thread-safety mechanism, as it does not enforce read-only access. De

The above is the detailed content of Does `const` Guarantee Thread-Safety in C 11?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template