Home > Backend Development > Golang > How Do `time.Sleep`, Blocking Tickers, and `select` Statements Differ in Their Blocking Mechanisms and Resource Consumption in Go?

How Do `time.Sleep`, Blocking Tickers, and `select` Statements Differ in Their Blocking Mechanisms and Resource Consumption in Go?

Susan Sarandon
Release: 2024-12-11 04:26:15
Original
700 people have browsed it

How Do `time.Sleep`, Blocking Tickers, and `select` Statements Differ in Their Blocking Mechanisms and Resource Consumption in Go?

Understanding the Behavior of Sleep and Select in Go

This question delves into the intricate workings of various blocking/waiting operations in Go, specifically focusing on time.Sleep, blocking tickers, and select statements. By understanding the underlying mechanisms, developers can optimize code performance and allocate resources efficiently.

time.Sleep

time.Sleep pauses the current goroutine for the specified duration. If the duration is negative or zero, it returns immediately. Internally, time.Sleep uses goparkunlock to put the goroutine into a waiting state until the timer expires. This entails creating a runtime.timer with a callback function that wakes up the goroutine upon timer expiry.

Blocking Ticker

time.NewTicker creates a *Ticker that generates a channel on which to signal ticks at the specified interval. The ticker internally utilizes a runtimeTimer, which sends the current time to the channel when the timer expires. Blocking the ticker using <- t.C essentially puts the goroutine into a waiting state until the next tick arrives.

Select Multiple

In a select statement with multiple channels, goroutines block on all channels simultaneously. When a channel receives data or closes, the corresponding case is selected, and the goroutine exits the waiting state. In the example provided, the select statement will block until either otherChan receives data or t.C generates a tick.

Comparison

All three options block the goroutine in different ways. time.Sleep utilizes a dedicated timer, while blocking on a ticker or a select channel relies on a timer and channel synchronization mechanisms. While the overhead of a channel may be slightly higher than a direct time.Sleep, it provides more flexible and powerful patterns.

Polling

There is no polling involved in any of these operations. The goroutine scheduler manages timers and wakes up goroutines when events occur. The timer-based operations (time.Sleep and tickers) are executed by a separate goroutine, while the select statement relies on channel-based notifications.

Resource Consumption

Assuming otherChan never receives data, the three options execute similarly. time.Sleep allocates a minimum of one runtime.timer, while the ticker allocates a runtimeTimer, a channel, and a buffer of at least one. The select statement allocates a channel and a buffer of at least one. Hence, the resource consumption for the ticker and select options may be slightly higher than time.Sleep due to additional channel semantics.

The above is the detailed content of How Do `time.Sleep`, Blocking Tickers, and `select` Statements Differ in Their Blocking Mechanisms and Resource Consumption in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template