


Building Robust SQL Transaction Execution in Go with a Generic Framework
When working with SQL databases in Go, ensuring atomicity and managing rollbacks during multi-step transactions can be challenging. In this article, I'll guide you through creating a robust, reusable, and testable framework for executing SQL transactions in Go, using generics for flexibility.
We'll build a SqlWriteExec utility for executing multiple dependent database operations within a transaction. It supports both stateless and stateful operations, enabling sophisticated workflows like inserting related entities while managing dependencies seamlessly.
Why Do We Need a Framework for SQL Transactions?
In real-world applications, database operations are rarely isolated. Consider these scenarios:
Inserting a user and updating their inventory atomically.
Creating an order and processing its payment, ensuring consistency.
With multiple steps involved, managing rollbacks during failures becomes crucial to ensure data integrity.
Working with go in Txn management.
If you are writing a database txn there might be several boiler plates that you might need to consider before writing the core logic. While this txn management is managed by spring boot in java and you never bothered much on those while writing code in java but this is not the case in golang. A simple example is provided below
func basicTxn(db *sql.DB) error { // start a transaction tx, err := db.Begin() if err != nil { return err } defer func() { if r := recover(); r != nil { tx.Rollback() } else if err != nil { tx.Rollback() } else { tx.Commit() } }() // insert data into the orders table _, err = tx.Exec("INSERT INTO orders (id, customer_name, order_date) VALUES (1, 'John Doe', '2022-01-01')") if err != nil { return err } return nil }
We cannot expect to repeat the rollback/commit code for every function. We have two options here either create a class which will provide a function as a return type which when executed in the defer will commit/rollback txn or create a wrapper class which will wrap all txn funcs together and execute in one go.
I went with the later choice and the change in code can be seen below.
func TestSqlWriteExec_CreateOrderTxn(t *testing.T) { db := setupDatabase() // create a new SQL Write Executor err := dbutils.NewSqlTxnExec[OrderRequest, OrderProcessingResponse](context.TODO(), db, nil, &OrderRequest{CustomerName: "CustomerA", ProductID: 1, Quantity: 10}). StatefulExec(InsertOrder). StatefulExec(UpdateInventory). StatefulExec(InsertShipment). Commit() // check if the transaction was committed successfully if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) return } verifyTransactionSuccessful(t, db) t.Cleanup( func() { cleanup(db) db.Close() }, ) }
func InsertOrder(ctx context.Context, txn *sql.Tx, order *OrderRequest, orderProcessing *OrderProcessingResponse) error { // Insert Order result, err := txn.Exec("INSERT INTO orders (customer_name, product_id, quantity) VALUES (, , )", order.CustomerName, order.ProductID, order.Quantity) if err != nil { return err } // Get the inserted Order ID orderProcessing.OrderID, err = result.LastInsertId() return err } func UpdateInventory(ctx context.Context, txn *sql.Tx, order *OrderRequest, orderProcessing *OrderProcessingResponse) error { // Update Inventory if it exists and the quantity is greater than the quantity check if it exists result, err := txn.Exec("UPDATE inventory SET product_quantity = product_quantity - WHERE id = AND product_quantity >= ", order.Quantity, order.ProductID) if err != nil { return err } // Get the number of rows affected rowsAffected, err := result.RowsAffected() if rowsAffected == 0 { return errors.New("Insufficient inventory") } return err } func InsertShipment(ctx context.Context, txn *sql.Tx, order *OrderRequest, orderProcessing *OrderProcessingResponse) error { // Insert Shipment result, err := txn.Exec("INSERT INTO shipping_info (customer_name, shipping_address) VALUES (, 'Shipping Address')", order.CustomerName) if err != nil { return err } // Get the inserted Shipping ID orderProcessing.ShippingID, err = result.LastInsertId() return err }
This code will be very much more precise and concise.
How the core logic is implemented
The idea is to isolate the txn to a single go struct such that it can accept multiple txns. By txn I mean functions which will do action with the txn that we created for the class.
type TxnFn[T any] func(ctx context.Context, txn *sql.Tx, processingReq *T) error type StatefulTxnFn[T any, R any] func(ctx context.Context, txn *sql.Tx, processingReq *T, processedRes *R) error
These two are function types which will take in a txn to process something. Now in the data layer implementing a create a function like this and pass it to the executor class which takes care of injecting the args and executing the function.
// SQL Write Executor is responsible when executing write operations // For dependent writes you may need to add the dependent data to processReq and proceed to the next function call type SqlTxnExec[T any, R any] struct { db *sql.DB txn *sql.Tx txnFns []TxnFn[T] statefulTxnFns []StatefulTxnFn[T, R] processingReq *T processedRes *R ctx context.Context err error }
This is where we store all the txn_fn details and we will have Commit() method to try committing the txn.
func (s *SqlTxnExec[T, R]) Commit() (err error) { defer func() { if p := recover(); p != nil { s.txn.Rollback() panic(p) } else if err != nil { err = errors.Join(err, s.txn.Rollback()) } else { err = errors.Join(err, s.txn.Commit()) } return }() for _, writeFn := range s.txnFns { if err = writeFn(s.ctx, s.txn, s.processingReq); err != nil { return } } for _, statefulWriteFn := range s.statefulTxnFns { if err = statefulWriteFn(s.ctx, s.txn, s.processingReq, s.processedRes); err != nil { return } } return }
You can find more examples and tests in the repo -
https://github.com/mahadev-k/go-utils/tree/main/examples
Though we bias towards distributed systems and consensus protocol nowadays, we still use sql and it still exists.
Let me know if anyone wish to contribute and build on top of this!!
Thanks for reading this far!!
https://in.linkedin.com/in/mahadev-k-934520223
https://x.com/mahadev_k_
The above is the detailed content of Building Robust SQL Transaction Execution in Go with a Generic Framework. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
