Building a Scalable SQS Consumer in Go
Introduction
When building distributed systems, message queues like Amazon SQS play a crucial role in handling asynchronous workloads. In this post, I'll share my experience implementing a robust SQS consumer in Go that handles user registration events for Keycloak. The solution uses the fan-out/fan-in concurrency pattern to process messages efficiently without overwhelming system resources.
The Challenge
I faced an interesting problem: process around 50,000 SQS events daily to register users in Keycloak. A naive approach might spawn a new goroutine for each message, but this could quickly lead to resource exhaustion. We needed a more controlled approach to concurrency.
Why Fan-out/Fan-in?
The fan-out/fan-in pattern is perfect for this use case because it:
- Maintains a fixed pool of worker goroutines
- Distributes work evenly across workers
- Prevents resource exhaustion
- Provides better control over concurrent operations
Implementation Deep Dive
1. The Consumer Structure
First, let's look at our basic consumer structure:
type Consumer struct { Client *sqs.Client QueueName string }
2. Message Processing Pipeline
The implementation consists of three main components:
- Message Receiver: Continuously polls SQS for new messages
- Worker Pool: Fixed number of goroutines processing messages
- Message Channel: Connects the receiver to workers
Here's how we start the consumer:
func StartPool[requestBody any]( serviceFunc func(c context.Context, dto *requestBody) error, consumer *Consumer) { ctx := context.Background() params := &sqs.ReceiveMessageInput{ MaxNumberOfMessages: 10, QueueUrl: aws.String(consumer.QueueName), WaitTimeSeconds: 20, VisibilityTimeout: 30, MessageAttributeNames: []string{ string(types.QueueAttributeNameAll), }, } msgCh := make(chan types.Message) var wg sync.WaitGroup // Start worker pool first startPool(ctx, msgCh, &wg, consumer, serviceFunc) // Then start receiving messages // ... rest of the implementation }
3. Key Configuration Parameters
Let's examine the crucial SQS configuration parameters:
- MaxNumberOfMessages (10): Batch size for each poll
- WaitTimeSeconds (20): Long polling duration
- VisibilityTimeout (30): Grace period for message processing
4. Worker Pool Implementation
The worker pool is where the fan-out pattern comes into play:
func startPool[requestBody any]( ctx context.Context, msgCh chan types.Message, wg *sync.WaitGroup, consumer *Consumer, serviceFunc func(c context.Context, dto *requestBody) error) { processingMessages := &sync.Map{} // Start 10 workers for i := 0; i < 10; i++ { go worker(ctx, msgCh, wg, consumer, processingMessages, serviceFunc) } }
5. Duplicate Message Handling
We use a sync.Map to prevent processing duplicate messages:
type Consumer struct { Client *sqs.Client QueueName string }
Best Practices and Learnings
- Error Handling: Always handle errors gracefully and log them appropriately
- Message Cleanup: Delete messages only after successful processing
- Graceful Shutdown: Implement proper shutdown mechanisms using context
- Monitoring: Add logging at key points for observability
Performance Considerations
- Worker Count: Choose based on your workload and available resources
- Batch Size: Balance between throughput and processing time
- Visibility Timeout: Set according to your average processing time
Future Improvements
- Dynamic Worker Scaling: Adjust worker count based on queue depth
- Circuit Breaker: Add circuit breaker for downstream services
- Metrics Collection: Add Prometheus metrics for monitoring
- Dead Letter Queue: Implement DLQ handling for failed messages
- Retries: Add exponential backoff for transient failures
Conclusion
The fan-out/fan-in pattern provides an elegant solution for processing high-volume SQS messages in Go. By maintaining a fixed worker pool, we avoid the pitfalls of unbounded goroutine creation while ensuring efficient message processing.
Remember to always consider your specific use case when implementing such patterns. The configuration values shown here (worker count, timeout values, etc.) should be adjusted based on your requirements and resource constraints.
Source code: [Link to your repository if available]
Tags: #golang #aws #sqs #concurrency #distributed-systems
The above is the detailed content of Building a Scalable SQS Consumer in Go. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
