Issue:
In traditional asynchronous programming, concurrent execution of multiple await operations is obstructed due to sequential processing.
Cause:
The code in question waits for the first await operation to complete before initiating the second.
Proposed Solution:
The initial proposal of obtaining promises before awaiting them separately does allow parallel execution. However, it introduces issues with error handling and potential unhandled rejection errors.
Recommended Approach:
Instead of the proposed solution, we recommend utilizing Promise.all:
const [value1, value2] = await Promise.all([getValue1Async(), getValue2Async()]);
Benefits of Promise.all:
Example:
Consider the following example that demonstrates the difference in timing and error handling:
const getValue1Async = () => { return new Promise(resolve => { setTimeout(resolve, 500, "value1"); }); }; const getValue2Async = () => { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { setTimeout(reject, 100, "error"); }); }; // Sequential execution with proposed solution (async () => { try { console.time("sequential"); const p1 = getValue1Async(); const p2 = getValue2Async(); const value1 = await p1; const value2 = await p2; } catch (e) { console.error(e); } console.timeEnd("sequential"); })(); // Concurrent execution with Promise.all setTimeout(async () => { try { console.time("concurrent"); const [value1, value2] = await Promise.all([getValue1Async(), getValue2Async()]); } catch (e) { console.timeEnd("concurrent", e); } }, 1000);
In the sequential execution example, the code waits 500ms for the first operation to complete before initiating the second. In contrast, the concurrent execution example handles the failure of the second operation immediately after 100ms.
The above is the detailed content of How Can Promise.all Improve Concurrent Await Execution and Error Handling?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!