Starting with an eye-catching title, "Why is Spark slow??," it's important to note that calling Spark "slow" can mean various things. Is it slow at aggregations? Data loading? Different cases exist. Also, "Spark" is a broad term, and its performance depends on factors like the programming language and usage context. So, let's refine the title to be more precise before diving in.
Since I primarily use Spark with Python on Databricks, I'll narrow the scope further.
The refined title will be:
"First Impressions of Spark: 'I Heard It Was Fast, But Why Does It Feel Slow?' A Beginner's Perspective"
As someone who works extensively with pandas, NumPy, and machine learning libraries, I admired the allure of Spark's ability to handle big data with parallel and distributed processing. When I finally got to use Spark for work, I was puzzled by scenarios where it seemed slower than pandas. Unsure of what was wrong, I discovered several insights and would like to share them.
Let's briefly cover Spark's basic architecture.
(Cluster Mode Overview)
A Spark cluster consists of Worker Nodes, which perform the actual processing, and a Driver Node, which coordinates and plans the execution. This architecture influences everything discussed below, so keep it in mind.
Now, onto the main points.
Spark is optimized for large-scale data processing, though it can handle small datasets as well. However, take a look at this benchmark:
(Benchmarking Apache Spark on a Single Node Machine)
The results show that for datasets under 15GB, pandas outperforms Spark in aggregation tasks. Why? In a nutshell, the overhead of Spark's optimizations outweighs the benefits for small datasets.
The link shows cases where Spark isn't slower, but these are often in a local cluster mode. For standalone setups, smaller datasets can be a disadvantage due to network communication overhead between nodes.
Spark employs lazy evaluation, meaning transformations are not executed immediately but deferred until an action (e.g., collect, count, show) triggers computation.
Example (pandas):
df = spark.read.table("tpch.lineitem").limit(1000).toPandas() df["l_tax_percentage"] = df["l_tax"] * 100 for l_orderkey, group_df in df.groupby("l_orderkey"): print(l_orderkey, group_df["l_tax_percentage"].mean())
Execution time: 3.04 seconds
Equivalent in Spark:
from pyspark.sql import functions as F sdf = spark.read.table("tpch.lineitem").limit(1000) sdf = sdf.withColumn("l_tax_percentage", F.col("l_tax") * 100) for row in sdf.select("l_orderkey").distinct().collect(): grouped_sdf = sdf.filter(F.col("l_orderkey") == row.l_orderkey).groupBy("l_orderkey").agg( F.mean("l_tax_percentage").alias("avg_l_tax_percentage") ) print(grouped_sdf.show())
Execution time: Still running after 3 minutes.
Why?
The Spark code effectively does this in pandas:
for l_orderkey, group_df in df.groupby("l_orderkey"): df["l_tax_percentage"] = df["l_tax"] * 100 print(l_orderkey, group_df["l_tax_percentage"].mean())
Avoid such patterns by using Spark's cache or restructuring the logic to minimize repeated calculations.
https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/rdd-programming-guide.html#shuffle-operations
Shuffles occur when data is redistributed across Workers, typically during operations like groupByKey, join, or repartition. Shuffles can be slow due to:
For example, having more Workers doesn't always improve performance during a shuffle.
Did you find this helpful? Spark is an excellent tool when used effectively. Beyond speeding up large-scale data processing, Spark shines with its scalable resource management, especially in the cloud.
Try Spark to optimize your data operations and management!
The above is the detailed content of Why Is Spark Slow??. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!