Why Does Misspelling \'__init__\' in Python Cause Constructor Errors?

Misspelling of Class Constructor Method: "def __int__" or "def _init_"

When defining a constructor method for a Python class, it's important to use the correct spelling: "__init__". Misspelling the method as "def __int__" or "def _init_" can lead to unexpected behavior.

Error Messages and Meaning

If the constructor is misspelled, you may encounter the following errors:

• "TypeError: Example() takes no arguments" (or "TypeError: object.__new__() takes no parameters"): This means the class constructor is using the default constructor from the parent class (e.g., "object"), which doesn't accept any parameters.
• "AttributeError: 'Example' object has no attribute 'attribute'": This indicates that instances of the class don't have the intended attributes because they weren't properly initialized.

Impact and Symptoms

Using an incorrectly named constructor can have various impacts:

• The class won't be initialized as expected.
• Instances may be missing essential attributes.
• Subsequent actions that rely on proper initialization can fail or cause unexpected behavior.

Why the Problem Occurs

Python treats "def __int__" and "def _init_" as ordinary methods rather than constructors. This is because the name itself is not special to Python; it's just a string value that matches the name of the method.

Prevention

To avoid this problem, always use the correct spelling "__init__" for the constructor method. Consider these preventive measures:

• Read the error messages carefully and pay attention to the specific line of code where the error occurs.
• Proofread your code thoroughly before running it.
• Use code linting tools to help identify potential issues.
• Train regularly to recognize and avoid common coding errors.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does Misspelling \'__init__\' in Python Cause Constructor Errors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!