


When Should I Use '=default' vs '{}' for Default Constructors and Destructors in C ?
Understanding the Distinction Between "=default" and "{}" for Default Constructors and Destructors
The question of whether "=default" behaves differently from an empty definition ("{}") for default constructors and destructors has nuanced implications. While they may appear similar for virtual destructors, their significance diverges when considering constructors and non-virtual destructors.
Default Constructors
Unlike with destructors, the distinction between "=default" and "{}" for default constructors has a significant impact.
Using "{}" creates a user-provided constructor, altering the semantics of the class. It places the responsibility of memory management within the constructor's logic, rendering the class non-trivial according to C 11 criteria. This prevents the compiler from engaging in specific optimizations regarding memory allocation.
=default, on the other hand, delegates the creation of the default constructor to the compiler, ensuring the class remains trivial. By indicating that a user-provided default constructor is not intended, it triggers optimizations related to memory handling.
Destructors
For virtual destructors, "=default" and "{}" have comparable effects, as both enable virtual destruction. However, if the destructor is non-virtual, these two options have contrasting implications.
An empty definition ("{}") for a non-virtual destructor yields a user-provided destructor, potentially altering destruction semantics. As a result, the class is no longer considered trivial.
By contrast, =default for a non-virtual destructor instructs the compiler to create a default destructor automatically. This preserves the trivial nature of the class by indicating that no user-provided destructor is necessary.
Conclusion
The choice between "=default" and "{}" for constructors and destructors depends on the desired behavior and coding constraints. For virtual destructors, both options are functionally equivalent. For non-virtual destructors, "=default" retains the class's trivial nature, while "{}" introduces user-defined destruction logic.
In the context of default constructors, "=default" ensures triviality and compiler-generated initialization, while "{}" enables custom memory management and non-triviality. These distinctions impact performance optimizations and memory allocation semantics, necessitating careful consideration based on the desired object behavior.
The above is the detailed content of When Should I Use '=default' vs '{}' for Default Constructors and Destructors in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



This article explains the C Standard Template Library (STL), focusing on its core components: containers, iterators, algorithms, and functors. It details how these interact to enable generic programming, improving code efficiency and readability t

This article details efficient STL algorithm usage in C . It emphasizes data structure choice (vectors vs. lists), algorithm complexity analysis (e.g., std::sort vs. std::partial_sort), iterator usage, and parallel execution. Common pitfalls like

This article details effective exception handling in C , covering try, catch, and throw mechanics. It emphasizes best practices like RAII, avoiding unnecessary catch blocks, and logging exceptions for robust code. The article also addresses perf

The article discusses using move semantics in C to enhance performance by avoiding unnecessary copying. It covers implementing move constructors and assignment operators, using std::move, and identifies key scenarios and pitfalls for effective appl

C 20 ranges enhance data manipulation with expressiveness, composability, and efficiency. They simplify complex transformations and integrate into existing codebases for better performance and maintainability.

The article discusses dynamic dispatch in C , its performance costs, and optimization strategies. It highlights scenarios where dynamic dispatch impacts performance and compares it with static dispatch, emphasizing trade-offs between performance and

Article discusses effective use of rvalue references in C for move semantics, perfect forwarding, and resource management, highlighting best practices and performance improvements.(159 characters)

C memory management uses new, delete, and smart pointers. The article discusses manual vs. automated management and how smart pointers prevent memory leaks.
