Home > Backend Development > C++ > Why Isn't the Copy Constructor Called in `A a = A(5);`?

Why Isn't the Copy Constructor Called in `A a = A(5);`?

Susan Sarandon
Release: 2024-12-15 14:12:15
Original
1054 people have browsed it

Why Isn't the Copy Constructor Called in `A a = A(5);`?

Understanding Why the Copy Constructor Is Not Called

In the provided code snippet, the constructor of class A is not invoked for the left-hand side object, despite the assumption that it should be. This behavior is not due to compiler optimization but rather an established feature of C .

According to the C standard (§12.8.15), the statement T = x; is equivalent to T(x);. Thus, in the code snippet:

A a = A(5);
Copy after login

The system first constructs A(5) and then assigns it to a. The copy constructor is not invoked because the assignment operator (=) is used.

To force the compiler to construct the left-hand side object defaultly, one can write the following code:

A a;
// a is now a fully constructed object
a = A(5);
Copy after login

In this scenario, a is default-constructed first, and the copy constructor is then invoked due to the object's full construction.

Therefore, it is crucial to be aware of this behavior and its potential implications in C programming.

The above is the detailed content of Why Isn't the Copy Constructor Called in `A a = A(5);`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template