What are the key differences between `//go:build` and `// build` in Go's conditional compilation?

Differences Between //go:build and // build

In Go 1.17, a new conditional compilation directive named //go:build was introduced as a replacement for the older // build directive. While both directives serve the same purpose of specifying build constraints, there are several key differences and advantages to using //go:build.

Syntax Differences:

• //go:build follows a similar syntax to other Go directives, like //go:generate. It takes a boolean expression as an argument, which determines whether the file should be included in the package during compilation.
• // build, on the other hand, uses a less intuitive syntax. It accepts a comma-separated list of tags to specify which platforms or conditions the file should be included for.

Implementation Details:

• In Go versions 1.17 and later, //go:build is the preferred directive and will be actively removed by the toolchain, as mentioned in the Go 1.18 release notes.
• // build will continue to be supported for a few Go releases to ensure a smooth transition, but its use is discouraged in newer versions.

Advantages of //go:build:

• Consistency: //go:build aligns with Go's other directives and pragmas, making it consistent and easier to remember.
• Improved Syntax: //go:build offers a more standard boolean expression syntax, using & and || for AND and OR conditions, respectively. This is in contrast to // build, which used commas for AND and spaces for OR.
• Go fmt Support: //go:build is supported by go fmt, which automatically fixes incorrect placement of the directive in source files. This helps avoid common mistakes, such as not leaving a blank line between the directive and the package statement.
• Detailed Error Messages: //go:build provides more detailed error messages during compilation, helping identify any issues with the build constraints.

Usage:

While both directives are used to specify build constraints, //go:build is generally preferred due to its advantages. Here's an example demonstrating the usage of both directives:

//go:build linux && amd64
package main

// +build linux,amd64
package main

In this example, both directives will achieve the same result, which is to include the main package only when compiling for Linux and 64-bit AMD architecture.

Conclusion:

//go:build offers several advantages over // build, including a consistent syntax, improved error messages, and go fmt support. It is the preferred directive for specifying build constraints in Go 1.17 and later.

The above is the detailed content of What are the key differences between `//go:build` and `// build` in Go's conditional compilation?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!