Is C 's Standard IOStreams Design Inherently Slow?

Does the C Standard Mandate Poor Performance for IOStreams?

While the question presents concerns about the performance of C standard library IOStreams, the answer highlights insights from the 2006 Technical Report on C Performance.

The report suggests that the standard does not mandate inefficiencies in IOStreams implementations. It outlines the potential for efficiency improvements using preprocessing and smarter linkers. However, it also acknowledges that such optimizations may not have been widely implemented.

Benchmark Analysis

The question includes benchmarks comparing the performance of IOStreams to custom buffer management. The answer focuses on profiling results from the execution of the ostringstream test. It identifies the primary bottleneck as std::basic_streambuf::xsputn, which calls std::copy after extensive checking and buffer updates.

Analysis and Conclusion

The answer argues that the slow performance observed in the benchmark is likely due to the use of a worst-case scenario. The small data chunks used in the test result in disproportionate overhead for checking and updating. In a real-world scenario with larger data chunks, these costs would be less significant.

The answer emphasizes the importance of considering the benefits of IOStreams, such as memory-safety and type-safety, which come at the expense of some performance. It suggests that the perceived performance issues may be mitigated by optimizing for larger data chunks and appreciating the value of the additional functionalities provided by IOStreams.

The above is the detailed content of Is C 's Standard IOStreams Design Inherently Slow?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!