Do Built-in Types Possess Default Constructors?
The notion that primitive types in C lack constructors has been a subject of debate. The argument stems from a flawed understanding of the term "default constructor" and the behavior of built-in types.
Default Constructors vs. Value Initialization
Default constructors are member functions that initialize an object's member variables when no other initialization method is specified. Intriguingly, built-in types exhibit similar behavior, leading some to assume the existence of default constructors. However, this assumption is incorrect.
Built-in Types: Absence of Constructors
Primitive types do not have explicit constructors in the traditional sense. Instead, they undergo value initialization, a process that assigns them a default value (e.g., zero for int). This process is not a constructor call; rather, it's a language-defined operation.
Syntax and Behavior: Mimicking Constructors
The introduction of uniform initialization syntax in C 11 introduced the ability to initialize primitive types using the syntax typically used for constructors (e.g., int x{5}). This syntax creates the illusion of constructor usage, but it's still value initialization.
Bjarne Stroustrup's Clarification
Bjarne Stroustrup, the creator of C , acknowledges this conceptual blurring. He suggests that built-in types "are considered to have constructors" due to their constructor-like behavior.
Conclusion
In conclusion, built-in types do not possess default constructors in the traditional sense. Their initialization process, known as value initialization, is a separate process that mimics the behavior of constructors. The uniform initialization syntax introduced in C 11 further obscures this distinction, leading some to mistakenly attribute the behavior of built-in types to the presence of default constructors.
The above is the detailed content of Do Built-in C Types Have Default Constructors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!