Why Can I Call sync.WaitGroup Methods on Values, Not Just Pointers?
Why Can sync.WaitGroup Methods Be Called on Values Instead of Pointers?
Despite the sync.WaitGroup documentation indicating that its methods require a *sync.WaitGroup receiver, it is possible to call these methods on values of type sync.WaitGroup. This is because all sync.WaitGroup methods have pointer receivers, meaning that the compiler will automatically convert the value to a pointer when the method is called.
The Empty Method Set of sync.WaitGroup
The actual method set of a sync.WaitGroup is empty. To confirm this, you can use reflection:
wg := sync.WaitGroup{} fmt.Println(reflect.TypeOf(wg).NumMethod()) // Output: 0
Therefore, the methods that appear to be defined on sync.WaitGroup values are actually part of the method set of *sync.WaitGroup.
Shorthand Notation for Calling Pointer Methods on Values
When you call a pointer method on a value, the compiler translates it to a call on the pointer to that value. For example:
var wg sync.WaitGroup wg.Add(1)
Is equivalent to:
(&wg).Add(1)
The Spec for Go states that if a variable is addressable and its method set contains a method, calling that method directly on the variable is shorthand for calling it on the pointer to that variable.
Related Question
For more information on this topic, refer to the related question:
- [Calling a method with a pointer receiver by an object instead of a pointer to it?](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4239271)
The above is the detailed content of Why Can I Call sync.WaitGroup Methods on Values, Not Just Pointers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
