Why Doesn't Go Have Generics?

Go's Curious Absence of Generics

Ever wondered why Go, despite its emphasis on orthogonality, lacks genuine support for generics? While the language offers a generic map provided by the compiler, custom implementations remain elusive.

The Rationale

The Go FAQ offers a succinct explanation: the development team acknowledges the convenience of generics but raises concerns about their impact on the type system and runtime complexity. They emphasize that the benefit does not currently outweigh the added complexity.

Alternatives and Trade-offs

Go provides alternative mechanisms to achieve similar functionality:

• Built-in containers: Maps and slices can be employed for collections, though they exhibit limitations in type safety.
• Empty interface: Using the empty interface (interface{}) enables the construction of containers, albeit with explicit unboxing.

Future Prospects

The FAQ suggests that generics remain an open issue, hinting at the possibility of their eventual implementation. However, no concrete plans or timelines have been announced.

Conclusion

Go's decision to forgo generics stems from a careful balancing of features and complexity. While generics offer convenience, the language designers prioritize stability and efficiency over immediate programmer ease.

The above is the detailed content of Why Doesn't Go Have Generics?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!