Template Restrictions: Constraining Types in C
In Java, one can restrict a generic class to accept only types that extend a specified base class using the extends keyword. This question explores if there is a comparable mechanism in C .
C Equivalent to Extends
Unlike Java, C typically does not define generic types based on inheritance constraints. However, one can utilize C 11's
#include <type_traits> template<typename T> class observable_list { static_assert(std::is_base_of<list, T>::value, "T must inherit from list"); // ... };
This enforces that T must be a class derived from list.
Alternative Approaches
C emphasizes inheritance constraints less strictly than Java. Instead, it is often preferable to define traits to constrain the generic type according to specific interfaces. This provides greater flexibility and avoids restricting users who may have non-inherited types that meet the interface requirements.
Duck Typing vs. Trait Constrained
One can adhere to "duck typing" by not imposing type constraints. However, this may lead to runtime errors. Alternatively, trait constraints ensure type safety through explicit error messages during compilation.
Example: Container Interface Constraints
Instead of inheriting from a base class, one can constrain a generic class to accept any container providing specific typedefs and member functions:
#include <type_traits> template<typename T> class observable_list { static_assert(has_const_iterator<T>::value, "Must have a const_iterator typedef"); static_assert(has_begin_end<T>::value, "Must have begin and end member functions"); // ... };
This exemplifies how C 's type traits and metaprogramming capabilities allow for powerful and flexible template restrictions.
The above is the detailed content of How Can C Templates Enforce Inheritance or Interface Constraints Like Java's `extends` Keyword?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!