In-Depth Analysis of Initialization Techniques in Constructors
Consider the following code:
MyClass::MyClass() : _capacity(15), _data(NULL), _len(0) {}
Versus:
MyClass::MyClass() { _capacity = 15; _data = NULL; _len = 0; }
It's important to note that the choice between using an initialization list and assigning values in a constructor depends on the specific requirements of member initialization.
Member Initialization List
An initialization list is used to initialize all members of the current object upon its construction. It is typically recommended for several scenarios:
In the example provided, where _capacity, _data, and _len are not constant members or references, both approaches are valid and will result in equivalent internally generated code. However, if any of these members were constant or a reference, the initialization list would be required.
Regular Assignments vs. Initialization List
While regular assignments within the constructor are generally considered acceptable for non-constant member variables, they have some drawbacks:
Conclusion
The use of an initialization list is recommended for initializing constant members, references, and passing parameters to base class constructors. For regular member variables, regular assignment statements may be more suitable, but the initialization list still provides a more concise and accurate approach.
The above is the detailed content of Initialization Lists vs. Assignments in Constructors: When Should You Use Which?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!