


How Can I Achieve 100% Test Coverage for Go's os.Exit() Scenarios with Goveralls?
Testing Go os.Exit Scenarios with Coverage Information (coveralls.io/Goveralls)
The ability to test scenarios involving os.Exit() is crucial in Go development. However, os.Exit() is difficult to intercept directly. A common method involves reinvoking the binary and checking the exit status.
This approach faces limitations, primarily the lack of coverage information with Goveralls and the potential fragility of rerunning the test binary.
Achieving 100% Coverage
To address these challenges, consider a refactoring of the testing code:
package foo import ( "fmt" "io" "log" "os" "testing" ) var ( osExit = os.Exit logFatalf = log.Fatalf ) // Tester interface for mocking os.Exit() and log.Fatalf() type Tester interface { Fatal(string, ...interface{}) Exit(int) } type realTester struct{} func (r realTester) Fatal(s string, v ...interface{}) { log.Fatalf(s, v...) } func (r realTester) Exit(code int) { os.Exit(code) } func Crasher() { fmt.Print("Going down in flames!") logFatalf("Exiting with code: %d", 1) } // TestCrasher simulates os.Exit() and log.Fatalf() func TestCrasher(t *testing.T) { tests := []struct { name string f func(t *testing.T, original Tester, tester *mockTester) }{ {"Test os.Exit()", func(t *testing.T, orig, test *mockTester) { orig.Exit(1) if test.exitCode != 1 { t.Errorf("expected exit code 1, got %d", test.exitCode) } }}, {"Test log.Fatalf()", func(t *testing.T, orig, test *mockTester) { orig.Fatalf("Exiting after a test failure") if test.format != "Exiting after a test failure" { t.Errorf("expected format \"Exiting after a test failure\", got %s", test.format) } }}, } for _, test := range tests { t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) { var orig Tester = realTester{} var mr mockTester test.f(t, orig, &mr) mr.Verify() }) } } // Mock tester simulates os.Exit() and log.Fatalf() type mockTester struct { format string values []interface{} exitCode int exitCalls int } func (m *mockTester) Fatal(s string, v ...interface{}) { m.format = s m.values = v m.exit() } func (m *mockTester) Exit(code int) { m.exitCode = code m.exit() } func (m *mockTester) exit() { m.exitCalls++ } // Verify checks that mockTester was called appropriately func (m *mockTester) Verify() { if m.exitCalls != 1 { panic("expected 1 call to Exit() or Fatal(), got %d", m.exitCalls) } }
This approach refactors the testing code into a reusable Tester interface, allowing for mocking of both os.Exit() and log.Fatalf(). By explicitly calling Exit() or Fatal() in the mock object and simulating the behavior, you can achieve 100% coverage for these scenarios.
The above is the detailed content of How Can I Achieve 100% Test Coverage for Go's os.Exit() Scenarios with Goveralls?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



OpenSSL, as an open source library widely used in secure communications, provides encryption algorithms, keys and certificate management functions. However, there are some known security vulnerabilities in its historical version, some of which are extremely harmful. This article will focus on common vulnerabilities and response measures for OpenSSL in Debian systems. DebianOpenSSL known vulnerabilities: OpenSSL has experienced several serious vulnerabilities, such as: Heart Bleeding Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160): This vulnerability affects OpenSSL 1.0.1 to 1.0.1f and 1.0.2 to 1.0.2 beta versions. An attacker can use this vulnerability to unauthorized read sensitive information on the server, including encryption keys, etc.

The article explains how to use the pprof tool for analyzing Go performance, including enabling profiling, collecting data, and identifying common bottlenecks like CPU and memory issues.Character count: 159

Queue threading problem in Go crawler Colly explores the problem of using the Colly crawler library in Go language, developers often encounter problems with threads and request queues. �...

The library used for floating-point number operation in Go language introduces how to ensure the accuracy is...

The article discusses writing unit tests in Go, covering best practices, mocking techniques, and tools for efficient test management.

Backend learning path: The exploration journey from front-end to back-end As a back-end beginner who transforms from front-end development, you already have the foundation of nodejs,...

The article discusses managing Go module dependencies via go.mod, covering specification, updates, and conflict resolution. It emphasizes best practices like semantic versioning and regular updates.

This article introduces a variety of methods and tools to monitor PostgreSQL databases under the Debian system, helping you to fully grasp database performance monitoring. 1. Use PostgreSQL to build-in monitoring view PostgreSQL itself provides multiple views for monitoring database activities: pg_stat_activity: displays database activities in real time, including connections, queries, transactions and other information. pg_stat_replication: Monitors replication status, especially suitable for stream replication clusters. pg_stat_database: Provides database statistics, such as database size, transaction commit/rollback times and other key indicators. 2. Use log analysis tool pgBadg
