Python String Formatting: % vs. .format vs. f-strings – Which Method Should You Choose?

String Formatting: Comparing % vs. .format vs. F-String Literals

Different Methods and Their Use Cases

String formatting in Python offers various options:

• % notation: Python <2.6: "{} % {}".format(arg1, arg2)
• .format method: Python 2.6 : "{}.format(arg1, arg2)".
• F-string literals: Python 3.6 : f"{arg1} {arg2}".

While all methods achieve the same outcome, each has unique characteristics:

• %: Allows for formatting multiple arguments using placeholders.
• .format: More flexible, supports named arguments and keyword arguments.
• F-string literals: Convenient syntax, avoids potential errors in placeholder formatting.

Performance Considerations

String formatting occurs upon evaluation of the expression. To avoid runtime performance penalties, minimize formatting operations to only when necessary. If possible, store interpolated strings as variables to reduce repeated formatting.

Advantages of .format and F-String Literals

Both .format and F-string literals offer advantages over % notation:

• Clarity: They provide a more intuitive and readable syntax.
• Flexibility: .format allows for named arguments, while F-string literals simplify argument formatting.
• Exception Handling: .format and F-string literals raise exceptions if placeholders are not matched correctly, reducing the risk of unexpected behavior.

Recommendation

For backward compatibility with Python 2.5, % notation may be preferred. However, if compatibility is not a concern, .format or F-string literals are recommended for their superior readability, flexibility, and performance advantages. F-string literals are especially suited for Python 3.6 and later versions.

The above is the detailed content of Python String Formatting: % vs. .format vs. f-strings – Which Method Should You Choose?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!