Golang interface{} Type Misunderstanding
When using the interface{} type as a function parameter, developers often encounter unexpected behavior, especially when interacting with JSON data through json.Unmarshal.
The Issue:
In Go, interface{} is a type that can hold any value and type. However, it's commonly misunderstood as a typeless container. This misunderstanding arises in situations like:
func test(i interface{}) { j := []byte(`{ "foo": "bar" }`) json.Unmarshal(j, &i) fmt.Println(i) } func main() { test(Test{}) }
Expected Behavior:
This code attempts to unmarshal JSON data into a Test struct. However, it results in an unexpected conversion of the struct to a map[string]interface{} type.
Explanation:
json.Unmarshal cannot unmarshal JSON into a non-pointer value. Since i is an interface{} holding a Test struct, it's passed as an address (&i) to allow modification. However, json.Unmarshal views the interface{} pointer as a pointer to an interface{} value containing the Test struct. Unable to unmarshal into a non-pointer, it defaults to creating a new map[string]interface{} value for the unmarshaled JSON.
The Right Approach:
To resolve this misunderstanding, consider the following scenario:
func test(i *interface{}) { j := []byte(`{ "foo": "bar" }`) json.Unmarshal(j, i) fmt.Println(*i) } func main() { var i *Test test(&i) }
Explanation:
Conclusion:
interface{} is a type that can hold any value, but it's not simply a placeholder for any type. To avoid unexpected behavior, properly handle pointers when using interface{} as function parameters, especially with JSON operations.
The above is the detailed content of How Can I Avoid Unexpected Behavior When Using Go's `interface{}` with `json.Unmarshal`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!