Unveiling the Enigmatic Member Function Pointer Invocation
In the world of object-oriented programming, member function pointers play a crucial role in manipulating class members. However, invoking a member function through a pointer can be a perplexing task. Consider the following code snippet:
class cat { public: void walk() { printf("cat is walking \n"); } }; int main(){ cat bigCat; void (cat::*pcat)(); pcat = &cat::walk; bigCat.*pcat(); }
Attempting to compile this code results in an error. The intriguing question remains: why does the seemingly innocuous bigCat.*pcat() statement fail to compile?
Deciphering the Problem
The answer lies in the precedence of operators. In this code snippet, the () expression has higher precedence than the .* pointer-to-member binding operator. Consequently, the compiler interprets the expression as (bigCat.*)pcat(), which is not the intended behavior.
Resolving the Conundrum
To resolve this issue, we need to explicitly specify the precedence of operations. By adding parentheses around the expression bigCat.*pcat(), we ensure that the pointer-to-member binding occurs first.
(bigCat.*pcat)();
Conclusion
With the correct placement of parentheses, the code now compiles and executes without errors. This serves as a reminder that understanding operator precedence is paramount in ensuring correct interpretation of your code.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `bigCat.*pcat()` Fail to Compile When Invoking a Member Function Pointer?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!