Home > Backend Development > C++ > Push_back vs. Emplace_back: When Should You Use Each in C ?

Push_back vs. Emplace_back: When Should You Use Each in C ?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Release: 2024-12-23 09:47:29
Original
714 people have browsed it

Push_back vs. Emplace_back: When Should You Use Each in C  ?

Push_back vs Emplace_back: A Deeper Analysis

Introduction

The distinction between push_back and emplace_back operations in C is often a source of confusion. Both functions are used to insert elements into a container, but they differ in their behavior, especially when working with rvalue references.

Understanding Push_back

push_back has three overloads: one taking a const value, one taking an rvalue reference, and another that takes a variadic number of arguments (C 11 onwards). In the context of rvalue references, push_back(Type&& _Val) behaves as expected: it directly inserts the rvalue reference into the container without creating a copy.

Emergence of Emplace_back

Microsoft Visual C (MSVC) introduced a seemingly redundant version of emplace_back that takes an rvalue reference: emplace_back(Type&& _Val). This overload is redundant because it is functionally equivalent to push_back(Type&& _Val) when used with an rvalue reference.

The True Power of Emplace_back

The true potential of emplace_back lies in its variadic overload: emplace_back(Args&&...). Unlike push_back, this overload allows for direct construction of objects within a container using forwarded arguments. This eliminates the need for creating temporary objects and the potential for unnecessary copying.

When to Use Emplace_back

emplace_back is particularly useful in situations where creating temporary objects would incur significant overhead. For instance, when inserting a complex object into a standard map:

std::map<int, Complicated> m;
int anInt = 4;
double aDouble = 5.0;
std::string aString = "C++";

// Avoids creating temporary objects
m.emplace(4, anInt, aDouble, aString);
Copy after login

MSVC's Partial Implementation

Despite introducing a non-standard emplace_back overload for rvalue references, MSVC has not yet implemented the full variadic version. The reason behind this is the lack of variadic template support in Visual C 10 at the time.

The above is the detailed content of Push_back vs. Emplace_back: When Should You Use Each in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template