C 11 Rvalue References and Move Semantics: Unraveling Return Values
In the realm of C 11, understanding rvalue references and move semantics is crucial. This article aims to clarify the differences between three code examples and determine which avoids vector duplication.
First Example
std::vector<int> return_vector(void) { std::vector<int> tmp {1,2,3,4,5}; return tmp; } std::vector<int> &&rval_ref = return_vector();
Here, the function returns a local variable, tmp, by value. The reference rval_ref binds to a copy of tmp. This is akin to:
const std::vector<int> &rval_ref = return_vector();
except that rval_ref cannot be used for non-const operations.
Second Example
std::vector<int> &&return_vector(void) { std::vector<int> tmp {1,2,3,4,5}; return std::move(tmp); } std::vector<int> &&rval_ref = return_vector();
This example incorrectly attempts to return a moved local variable, tmp. Since tmp is destroyed when the function exits, rval_ref holds a dangling reference. This is likely to cause a runtime error.
Third Example
std::vector<int> return_vector(void) { std::vector<int> tmp {1,2,3,4,5}; return std::move(tmp); } std::vector<int> &&rval_ref = return_vector();
This example is similar to the first, where tmp is returned by value. The std::move call is redundant and can degrade performance by disabling return value optimization (RVO).
Best Practice
For optimal performance, use the following approach:
std::vector<int> return_vector(void) { std::vector<int> tmp {1,2,3,4,5}; return tmp; } std::vector<int> rval_ref = return_vector();
The local variable tmp is implicitly treated as an rvalue in the return statement. The compiler will apply RVO, avoiding copies or moves, or it will use the move constructor if necessary.
The above is the detailed content of How Can C 11 Rvalue References and Move Semantics Optimize Vector Return Values?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!