Understanding the Context:
Async methods in C# can return either Task or void. While async void methods can appear convenient in certain scenarios, they introduce potential drawbacks that make them generally discouraged. Let's examine why async void is considered bad practice and how to approach these situations more effectively.
Reasons to Avoid async void:
Alternative Approaches:
In the provided example, where the focus lies on reacting to a button click without awaiting the result, a more suitable approach is to define the PrimeCustomTask method as async Task and utilize the OnLoad method as an entry point for starting the asynchronous operation. This way, all the benefits of async Task methods are preserved:
protected override async void OnLoad(EventArgs e) { if (CustomTask == null) await PrimeCustomTask(); } private async Task PrimeCustomTask() { CustomTask = new TaskCompletionSource<int>(); while (CustomTask.Task.IsCompleted == false && IsDisposed == false) { // Wait for button click to set the value await Task.Delay(100); } int result = CustomTask.Task.Result; // Show the value if (result != 0) MessageBox.Show(result.ToString()); }
By adhering to these guidelines, you can avoid the pitfalls of async void methods and improve the maintainability, reusability, and testability of your code.
The above is the detailed content of When and Why Is `async void` a Bad Practice in C#?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!