Home > Backend Development > C++ > Constructor Injection vs. Singleton or Argument Passing in Unity: Which Dependency Injection Approach is Best?

Constructor Injection vs. Singleton or Argument Passing in Unity: Which Dependency Injection Approach is Best?

Barbara Streisand
Release: 2024-12-27 22:13:10
Original
650 people have browsed it

Constructor Injection vs. Singleton or Argument Passing in Unity: Which Dependency Injection Approach is Best?

Dependency Injection in Unity: Constructor Injection vs. Singleton or Argument Passing

When utilizing dependency injection frameworks such as Unity, a crucial consideration arises regarding how to resolve dependencies within deeper layers of an application.

In the presented scenario, the TestSuiteParser class requires access to TestSuite and TestCase instances. To address this, several approaches are explored:

Singleton Unity Container

Creating a singleton to store the Unity container provides access to the container from anywhere in the codebase. However, this approach introduces a dependency on the container itself, which is less than ideal.

Passing Unity Container as Argument

Passing the Unity container as an argument to every class that requires dependencies can become cumbersome and visually displeasing.

Constructor Injection

The preferred solution for dependency injection is constructor injection. In this pattern, dependencies are declared as parameters in the class constructor, as demonstrated in the TestSuiteParser class below:

public class TestSuiteParser
{
    private readonly TestSuite _testSuite;
    private readonly TestCase _testCase;

    public TestSuiteParser(TestSuite testSuite, TestCase testCase)
    {
        _testSuite = testSuite ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(testSuite));
        _testCase = testCase ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(testCase));
    }

    // ...
}
Copy after login

By using constructor injection, dependencies are automatically resolved by the container when an instance of the class is created. This approach ensures that the class has the necessary dependencies available at instantiation.

In the composition root, the Unity container can be configured as follows:

container.RegisterType<TestSuite, ConcreteTestSuite>();
container.RegisterType<TestCase, ConcreteTestCase>();
container.RegisterType<TestSuiteParser>();

var parser = container.Resolve<TestSuiteParser>();
Copy after login

When the container resolves the TestSuiteParser instance, it automatically injects the TestSuite and TestCase dependencies.

Conclusion

Constructor injection provides a clean and efficient way to resolve dependencies in unity, eliminating the drawbacks of the singleton or argument passing approaches. This approach promotes loose coupling and improved testability in your application.

The above is the detailed content of Constructor Injection vs. Singleton or Argument Passing in Unity: Which Dependency Injection Approach is Best?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template