Why Doesn't My React Router Work After a Page Refresh or Manual URL Entry?

Dealing with URLs in React-router

URLs Don't Work on Refresh or Manual Typing

When using React-Router, there's a distinction between server-side and client-side routing. Typically, your app starts by sending an initial request to the server for a static HTML file that contains the React scripts. Once loaded, the client handles subsequent URL changes, without making new server requests.

The Problem: When you refresh or manually type in a URL that aligns with a server-side route (e.g., /joblist) while in client-side routing mode, it won't render the intended view. Instead, you might encounter a "Cannot GET /joblist" error.

Server-Side vs. Client-Side Routing

Server-Side: The server handles all URL routing. In a static HTML site, the server would send an HTML page for the specific URL, such as /joblist.

Client-Side Routing: React-Router handles URL routing on the client side. Instead of requesting a new page from the server, it dynamically updates the displayed content based on the URL change.

Resolving the Issue

To fix this, you need to establish routes on both the server and client sides. Here are possible ways to do so:

Hash History (Browser History's Predecessor)

This approach uses URLs with a hash (#) prefix, like /joblist#/about. The part after the hash is not sent to the server, so the server always sees the root URL (/). Client-side, React-Router handles the #/about portion.

Downsides:

• Unattractive URLs
• No server-side rendering, negatively impacting SEO.

Catch-All

Set up a catch-all route on the server. For example, if the server receives any URL that doesn't match a specific route, it sends the index.html file. This ensures that no matter what URL is typed in, the React app loads.

Downsides:

• More complex setup
• Suboptimal SEO, as all pages return the same content.

Hybrid

This approach combines the catch-all with specific server-side routes for important pages. You could provide static HTML files for these pages, making their content available to search engines.

Downsides:

• More complex setup
• Limited SEO benefits
• Code duplication (rendering content both on the client and server).

Isomorphic

In this approach, both the server and client execute the same JavaScript code. This solves the issue by sending the same markup to the client, whether the page transition occurs on the server or client-side.

Downsides:

• Server must run JavaScript (often Node.js)
• Environmental challenges
• Steep learning curve

Choosing the Right Solution

Consider the following factors:

• Simplicity: Catch-all is a relatively easy setup.
• SEO: Isomorphic is the optimal solution for SEO, but it requires more effort.
• Server Technology: If your server runs on Node.js, isomorphic is a suitable choice.

Ultimately, the best option for you depends on your specific requirements and technical capabilities.

The above is the detailed content of Why Doesn't My React Router Work After a Page Refresh or Manual URL Entry?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!