How to Eliminate Unused Code from Go Binaries at Compile Time?
How to Remove Unused Code at Compile Time in Go?
When creating a Go package used by multiple entities and imported using the standard method, it's observed that all utilities, including the small ones, result in large binaries at compile time. Investigating the issue reveals that the entire package is compiled into each utility, even functions that are not utilized.
To delver into the issue further, consider the following code:
main.go:
package main import "play/subplay" func main() { subplay.A() }
play/subplay.go:
package subplay func A() { fmt.Printf("this is function A()") } func B() { fmt.Printf("secret string") }
Despite Function B() not being called, its string value, "secret string," appears in the compiled binary main.exe. This behavior raises the question of how to eliminate unused code from Go programs at compile time.
The answer lies in the fact that the Go compiler already handles this task. In the compilation process, the compiler packages code into archive files (.a) and only includes essential components in the executable binary. It excludes items that are identifiable as unreachable.
It's crucial to note that if an imported package imports other packages, this filtering process must be applied recursively. For instance, importing a package that imports additional packages will cause those dependent packages to be included as well.
Here are a few illustrative examples:
Importing a package without using any functionality:
package main import _ "play/subplay" func main() { }
In this case, the resulting binary will be approximately 1 MB. However, if the imported package imports net/http:
package subplay import _ "net/http" func A() {}
And you still don't use net/http within your code, the binary size will increase significantly to approximately 5 MB due to net/http importing 39 other packages.
And when you start using net/http but don't call subplay.A() in the main package, the executable size remains the same.
package subplay import "net/http" func A() { http.ListenAndServe("", nil) }
It's only when you make a call to subplay.A() from the main package that the binary size increases further:
package main import "play/subplay" func main() { subplay.A() }
The takeaway is that the code included in the executable binary is directly influenced by the functions and modules you call from imported packages.
Moreover, it's essential to remember that Go is a statically linked language, meaning the executable binary must contain everything it requires to run.
The above is the detailed content of How to Eliminate Unused Code from Go Binaries at Compile Time?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
