


How to Effectively Mock `c.BindQuery` and Service Calls in Gin Handler Function Unit Tests?
Mocking c.BindQuery in Gin Handler Function Unit Tests
Unit testing Go Gin handler functions often involves mocking certain operations to isolate and test specific scenarios. One such operation is c.BindQuery, which binds request query string parameters to a given struct.
When testing GetMaterialByFilter, the test would fail due to an error related to invalid memory access or nil pointer dereference. This error stems from the fact that c.BindQuery was not properly initialized with a valid HTTP request.
To mock c.BindQuery, create an http.Request and set its URL and URL.RawQuery fields. This allows you to simulate the request that would be received by the handler function:
func mockGin() (*gin.Context, *httptest.ResponseRecorder) { w := httptest.NewRecorder() c, _ := gin.CreateTestContext(w) req := &http.Request{ URL: &url.URL{}, Header: make(http.Header), } testQuery := weldprogs.QueryParam{/* ... */} q := req.URL.Query() for _, s := range testQuery.Basematgroup_id { q.Add("basematgroup_id", s) } req.URL.RawQuery = q.Encode() c.Request = req return c, w }
Testing Service Calls
The handler function also makes a call to a service method, services.WeldprogService.GetMaterialByFilter. To test this call, the service must be injectable, either through the handler function signature or by setting it as a Gin context value.
If the service is an interface, it can be injected using the c.Set method:
func GetMaterialByFilter(c *gin.Context) { //... weldprogService := mustGetService(c) materialByFilter, getErr := weldprogService.GetMaterialByFilter(&queryParam) // ... } func mustGetService(c *gin.Context) services.WeldprogService { svc, exists := c.Get("svc_context_key") if !exists { panic("service was not set") } return svc.(services.WeldprogService) }
Mock the service in the unit tests by implementing the required interface and setting it as the service context value:
type mockSvc struct {} func (mockSvc) GetMaterialByFilter(*weldprogs.QueryParam) (*materialByFilter, error) { /* ... */} func TestGetMaterialByFilter(t *testing.T) { w := httptest.NewRecorder() c, _ := gin.CreateTestContext(w) c.Set("svc_context_key", &mockSvc{}) GetMaterialByFilter(c) // ... }
By following these steps, you can effectively mock both c.BindQuery and service calls to isolate and thoroughly test your Gin handler function.
The above is the detailed content of How to Effectively Mock `c.BindQuery` and Service Calls in Gin Handler Function Unit Tests?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
