When maintaining data consistency, developers often face a dilemma between transactions and locking tables. To fully comprehend their roles, let's explore the scenario you described:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE (...) LIMIT 1 if (condition passes) { // Update row I got from the select UPDATE table SET column = "value" WHERE (...) ... other logic (including INSERT some data) ... }
Locking the entire table (LOCK TABLES table) ensures exclusive access during the operation, preventing other queries from interfering. However, this approach can be overly restrictive.
Transactions, on the other hand, provide a more flexible mechanism. By starting a transaction, you create an isolated environment where your operations are not visible to other sessions until committed or rolled back. This can prevent concurrent SELECT operations from reading outdated data.
SELECT ... FOR UPDATE explicitly locks the selected rows, allowing your subsequent updates to proceed without interference. However, it does not prevent other sessions from reading the rows.
SELECT ... LOCK IN SHARE MODE allows concurrent reads but blocks writes, ensuring that no other sessions can update the locked rows.
The ideal approach depends on your specific requirements:
Understanding the differences between transactions and locking tables is crucial for ensuring database integrity. By selecting the appropriate technique, you can prevent race conditions, deadlocks, and data corruption, ensuring the smooth and reliable execution of database operations.
The above is the detailed content of Transactions or Table Locking: How to Best Ensure Database Integrity?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!