Interpretation of Integer Literals with Leading Zeroes
Integer literals with leading zeroes can behave unexpectedly in Java, exhibiting a different numerical value from their counterparts without leading zeroes. This behavior stems from the interpretation of leading zeroes as a base prefix.
When a numeric literal is prefixed with a zero, it is interpreted as an octal (base-8) number. This is because in octal notation, numbers can range from 0 to 7. Thus, "0123" represents the octal number 123.
To convert this octal number to its decimal equivalent, each digit is multiplied by its corresponding power of 8 and the results are summed. For "0123," this calculation is:
(1 * 8 * 8) + (2 * 8) + (3) = 83
Therefore, the code "System.out.println(0123)" prints 83.
In contrast, "123" without a leading zero is interpreted as a decimal number. The decimal number 123 is simply the sum of its digits (1 2 3), which is 123. Thus, "System.out.println(123)" prints 123.
Avoid Misinterpretation
To avoid the unexpected behavior of leading zeroes in integer literals, it is recommended to always start decimal numbers with a non-zero digit. If a literal is intended to be expressed in base-10, it should not have a leading zero.
Alternative Base Notations
While octal is no longer commonly used, Java does provide a way to specify hexadecimal (base-16) numbers using the "0x" prefix. For example, "0x123" represents the hexadecimal number 123, which is equivalent to the decimal number 291.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Leading Zeros in Java Integer Literals Change Their Value?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!