Despite its intended role solely as a return type, the use of Optional as method arguments has been debated. Let's explore the arguments in favor of avoiding this practice:
Passing optional parameters can lead to conditional logic within the method, complicating the code and making it harder to maintain. Consider the following example:
public int calculateSomething(Optional<String> p1, Optional<BigDecimal> p2) { if (p1.isPresent() && p2.isPresent()) { return // ... logic with both values present } else if (p1.isPresent()) { return // ... logic with only p1 present } else if (p2.isPresent()) { return // ... logic with only p2 present } else { return // ... logic with both values absent } }
Wrapping nullable parameters in Optional incurs unnecessary runtime overhead by adding an extra layer of abstraction. In comparison, using nullable parameters directly requires less overhead.
Optional incurs additional costs compared tonullable parameters. The presence of the Optional wrapper requires additional checks and operations, which can impact performance, especially in performance-critical applications.
While it's not allowed to pass null directly as an optional parameter, there's still a risk of someone passing an Optional containing null. This can lead to unexpected behavior and potential NullPointerExceptions.
While passing Optionals as method arguments may have its proponents, the potential for conditional logic, unnecessary wrapping, performance implications, and the risk of null input make it generally undesirable. For method input, nullable parameters represent a cleaner and more efficient alternative. By following this guideline, developers can promote code readability, maintainability, and performance.
The above is the detailed content of Should You Avoid Optional Arguments in Java 8 Methods?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!