Why Do Java and Go Produce Different GZIP Compression Results?
Why Does Gzip Compression Differ Between Java and Go?
When compressing data using gzip in Java and Go, you may encounter different results. This disparity stems from fundamental differences in data representation and compression implementation.
Byte Representation
Java's byte type is signed, ranging from -128 to 127. In Go, the byte type is an alias for uint8, representing unsigned integers from 0 to 255. This means that negative values in Java must be shifted by 256 to match the range of Go bytes.
Compression Differences
Even after accounting for byte representation, compression results may still diverge between Java and Go. The gzip algorithm, which employs LZ77 and Huffman coding, is influenced by the frequency of input characters. Variations in character frequencies can lead to different output codes and bit patterns.
Additionally, different implementations may employ different default compression levels. While Java and Go both nominally use a default level of 6, slight variations in implementation can account for residual differences.
Achieving Similar Output
To eliminate these differences and obtain matching gzip outputs, you can set the compression level to 0 in both languages. Java offers the Deflater.NO_COMPRESSION option, while Go provides gzip.NoCompression.
Example Java Code:
ByteArrayOutputStream buf = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); GZIPOutputStream gz = new GZIPOutputStream(buf) { { def.setLevel(Deflater.NO_COMPRESSION); } }; gz.write("helloworld".getBytes("UTF-8")); gz.close(); for (byte b : buf.toByteArray()) System.out.print((b & 0xff) + " ");
Example Go Code:
var buf bytes.Buffer gz, _ := gzip.NewWriterLevel(&buf, gzip.NoCompression) gz.Write([]byte("helloworld")) gz.Close() fmt.Println(buf.Bytes())
Header Fields
It's worth noting that gzip includes optional header fields, such as modification time and file name. Java does not add these fields by default, while Go does. Therefore, even with the same compression level, exact output may not be achieved due to these additional headers.
Practical Considerations
Although the compressed outputs may not match between Java and Go, the data can still be decompressed using any compatible gzip decoder. Decompressed data will be identical irrespective of the compression implementation. Therefore, the differences in output are not practically significant.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Java and Go Produce Different GZIP Compression Results?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

OpenSSL, as an open source library widely used in secure communications, provides encryption algorithms, keys and certificate management functions. However, there are some known security vulnerabilities in its historical version, some of which are extremely harmful. This article will focus on common vulnerabilities and response measures for OpenSSL in Debian systems. DebianOpenSSL known vulnerabilities: OpenSSL has experienced several serious vulnerabilities, such as: Heart Bleeding Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160): This vulnerability affects OpenSSL 1.0.1 to 1.0.1f and 1.0.2 to 1.0.2 beta versions. An attacker can use this vulnerability to unauthorized read sensitive information on the server, including encryption keys, etc.

The library used for floating-point number operation in Go language introduces how to ensure the accuracy is...

Backend learning path: The exploration journey from front-end to back-end As a back-end beginner who transforms from front-end development, you already have the foundation of nodejs,...

Queue threading problem in Go crawler Colly explores the problem of using the Colly crawler library in Go language, developers often encounter problems with threads and request queues. �...

The difference between string printing in Go language: The difference in the effect of using Println and string() functions is in Go...

Under the BeegoORM framework, how to specify the database associated with the model? Many Beego projects require multiple databases to be operated simultaneously. When using Beego...

The problem of using RedisStream to implement message queues in Go language is using Go language and Redis...

This article introduces a variety of methods and tools to monitor PostgreSQL databases under the Debian system, helping you to fully grasp database performance monitoring. 1. Use PostgreSQL to build-in monitoring view PostgreSQL itself provides multiple views for monitoring database activities: pg_stat_activity: displays database activities in real time, including connections, queries, transactions and other information. pg_stat_replication: Monitors replication status, especially suitable for stream replication clusters. pg_stat_database: Provides database statistics, such as database size, transaction commit/rollback times and other key indicators. 2. Use log analysis tool pgBadg
