Why Use 'new String(...)' in Java, and What Are the Potential Pitfalls?

Understanding the Purpose of ""new String(...)"" in Java

While exploring code samples, you may encounter instances where a String literal is assigned to a String object via the "new" operator. This raises questions about its purpose and potential impact.

This syntax, as opposed to simply assigning the String literal directly (e.g., "s = "Hello World"";), has sparked curiosity. Traditionally, String literals are stored in the constant pool, leading to the assumption that no memory would be allocated on the heap.

However, you should avoid this assumption because the behavior of "new String(...)" is implementation-dependent and undocumented.

Pitfalls and Implications

One potential misconception is that using "new String(...)" will force a distinct copy of the internal character array. However, this behavior is not guaranteed across different Java implementations.

For example, in Apache Harmony's implementation, "new String(...)" does not create a new character array but instead references the same array as the original String. This highlights the importance of relying on documentation rather than specific implementation assumptions.

Alternatives for Ensuring Distinct Strings

If you need to ensure a new, distinct String object, there's a workaround: using "new String(...)" with "toCharArray()". While this involves an additional character array copy, it provides implementation-agnostic protection.

Conclusion

The purpose of "new String(...)" in Java remains elusive and should be used with caution. Always refer to documentation and consider specific implementation details to avoid unexpected behavior. Remember, "new String(...)" may not always create a distinct character array copy, leaving you exposed to unintentional memory retention issues.

The above is the detailed content of Why Use 'new String(...)' in Java, and What Are the Potential Pitfalls?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!